Collaborative

Collaborative Threat Modeling

Collaborative security analysis on a shared architecture diagram, with AI threat detection

Presence, shared editing and a change feed, so a threat model is reviewed by the people who disagree about it rather than written alone.

Watch it run — one diagram, three people

Stage 1 of 5
aribot · Threat Modeling · shared diagram1 editing now
DiagramThreatsControlsCommentsHistoryShare
In this diagramArchitect

Editing now

0

live presence

Threats on diagram

—

not measured yet

Accepted

—

not measured yet

Disputed

—

not measured yet

Shared canvas
cursors are live
ClientGatewayAPIDatabaseArchitect
Change feed

One person on the diagram — nothing has changed yet.

Useryou do this step

Open the diagram

GOES IN

A shared architecture

COMES OUT

working…

ILLUSTRATIVE SEED DATA — NOT CUSTOMER DATA

1 person editing

Run log
t+0.0s [User] Open the diagram
working on: A shared architecture

Who this is for

An architect running a review

When it comes up

Threat models get written by one person and reviewed by nobody who disagrees with them.

What changes

Several people work the same diagram at once, and the change feed records who did what.

A security lead in the session

When it comes up

Disagreements get resolved by deleting the finding, leaving no trace that anyone objected.

What changes

Disputed threats stay on the model as disputed, with the reviewer's reason attached.

A team distributed across time zones

When it comes up

Review happens in a meeting nobody can all attend, so it happens partially or not at all.

What changes

Presence and edits are live, and the history shows what changed between sessions.

Unified Workbench0 AI-Analysed Nodes
ClientGatewayAuthThreat DetectedAPIDatabaseThreat DetectedCacheStorageKubernetes Cluster - Production Environment

AI-Powered Analysis

AI threat analysis of each component on the diagram

Real-Time Collaboration

Live updates across distributed security teams

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Automatic technique identification and classification

Illustrative figures — not customer data

STRIDE, PASTA, MITRE
Methodologies
0
Threats Detected
example figure
3.2s
Analysis Time
example figure

Join 1,200+ teams protecting their infrastructure with Aribot

Why teams use this

Use cases and case studies

Use case

Threat model as a team, with disagreements on record

Several people edit one architecture at once, Aribot derives threats on each change, and disputed threats stay on the model with the reason attached.

By industry

All use cases and case studies